Greenwich, Connecticut · Street record
West Brother Drive
34 parcels and 34 recorded sales since 2002, from public transaction, assessor and parcel records.
Recorded sales34
Latest saleSep 2025
5-year median$2.95M7 sales
Parcels34
Most recent first
Recorded sales on West Brother Drive
Owner-free public parcel profiles
Parcels on West Brother Drive
- 0 West Brother Driveno building
- 0 West Brother Driveno building
- 2 West Brother Drive5,225 sq ft
- 12 West Brother Drive3,875 sq ft
- 18 West Brother Drivesold 2022
- 20 West Brother Drive6,753 sq ft
- 23 West Brother Drivesold 2003
- 24 West Brother Drive4,052 sq ft
- 29 West Brother Drivesold 2022
- 31 West Brother Drive2,650 sq ft
- 35 West Brother Drivesold 2013
- 36 West Brother Drivesold 2017
- 39 West Brother Drive5,410 sq ft
- 40 West Brother Drivesold 2010
- 43 West Brother Drivesold 2025
- 44 West Brother Drivesold 2025
- 45 West Brother Drivesold 2019
- 48 West Brother Drive5,669 sq ft
- 49 West Brother Drivesold 2015
- 52 West Brother Drivesold 2018
- 53 West Brother Drivesold 2019
- 56 West Brother Drivesold 2010
- 57 West Brother Drivesold 2021
- 60 West Brother Drivesold 2023
- 61 West Brother Drive4,557 sq ft
- 64 West Brother Drive5,365 sq ft
- 65 West Brother Drive5,776 sq ft
- 68 West Brother Drive3,317 sq ft
- 69 West Brother Drivesold 2025
- 72 West Brother Drive4,257 sq ft
- 75 West Brother Drivesold 2014
- 78 West Brother Drivesold 2020
- 79 West Brother Drivesold 2021
- 81 West Brother Drive5,844 sq ft
About this page
Real records, grouped by street
Sales are observed public-record transactions; parcel facts are the latest owner-free public assessment context. Prices are not adjusted for size, condition or time. No owner names are collected or displayed.
Free weekly briefing · Greenwich edition
Researching West Brother Drive? Get the Greenwich briefing.
Every Thursday: new recorded sales, planning decisions and market moves across Greenwich, sourced to public records. Free.
Free · Thursday email · unsubscribe anytime. Prefer Substack? Subscribe there instead.